Trump, Tiptoeing the Edge of the Constitution: The Night Before Taking Office, He Capitalized on a MEME Coin Craze
Original Article by: Zack Guzmán, Founder and Host of Coinage_media
Article Translation by: Ashley, BlockBeats
Editor's Note: The author points out that the Trump family cleverly circumvented the Constitution's Emoluments Clause controversy when launching the $TRUMP and $MELANIA tokens. By strategically entering the NFT and cryptocurrency space early on, they leveraged Web3 to maximize their interests within legal boundaries.
The following is the original content (slightly reorganized for better readability):
The Trump family rapidly rolled out the $TRUMP and $MELANIA tokens just before the inauguration ceremony for a very crucial reason. Whether you love or hate Trump, the fact is, delaying even one more day could have exposed him to the risk of constitutional violations and potential impeachment once again.
According to the Constitution, the President must not abuse their power for personal gain. In particular, the Emoluments Clause explicitly prohibits the President from receiving benefits or profits from foreign governments. This is precisely why these tokens are so noteworthy.
Over the past few years, the Trump couple has been testing the market waters through various NFT releases. They have used separate companies and seemingly different teams. These companies have paid Melania and Trump respective fees, thus maintaining the "independence" of direct token purchases.

According to Trump's public tax filings, he earned approximately $7.2 million through involvement in NFT-related transactions. This income is linked to his partnership with CIC Digital in the $TRUMP project. Melania, on the other hand, earned over $330,000 through an agreement related to NFT sales.

Despite all this appearing convoluted, one thing is certain: launching these tokens before Trump formally became President made things easier. Failing to do so would have made it easier to allege that Trump benefited from the presidency and violated the Emoluments Clause.
While our founding fathers hoped to prevent the President from unduly profiting from power, I don't think Jefferson or Madison ever discussed meme coins. What do you think?
You may also like

Morning Report | Binance launches DYOR research tool; YZi Labs launches recruitment platform YZi Talent; Vitalik states that the Ethereum Foundation will "downsize" and reduce the amount of ETH sold

Morning News | Michael Saylor stated that this week he bought bonds instead of Bitcoin; StablR was attacked and lost about 2.8 million dollars; the U.S. Congress is pushing the Bitcoin Reserve Act again

SuperEx's Mars exploration dream: Digital currency is the key to unlocking economic exchanges in the interstellar era

Key Takeaways: Full Text of Google Chief Scientist Shanahan's Speech

Agentic Design Patterns: A book that made me rethink "What exactly is an Agent?"

The richest chairman of the Federal Reserve in 112 years has arrived: Kevin Warsh is rewriting the rules

Vitalik talks about the future of the Ethereum Foundation: a smaller, more distinctive, yet more enduring ship

New Types of Information Laundering in Prediction Markets: How Secrets Integrate into Investment Signals

Vitalik emphasized in a post that Ethereum must be "amazing," but the foundation is not the center

DeFi has reached its most dangerous moment: the real vulnerabilities are not in the code

WEEX Bitcoin Pizza Day: Zero Fees, BTC Cashback & 150,000 USDT to Honor Crypto History

a16z: 7 Images to Understand How Tokenization Changes the Nature of Assets

The secret to Hyperliquid's success dismantled from the five-layer financial stack

After Futu Securities was banned, will buying stocks on-chain be the new remedy?
Why Crypto Traders Are Watching Gold and Nasdaq Again in 2026

Why have foreign exchange stablecoins never taken off?

AIDC, computing power leasing, and cloud: The "three-part thesis" of AI transformation in cryptocurrency mining farms

